Case A: aiming for olefins
Choosing a light, paraffin-rich feedstock makes the steam-cracking storyline easy to read.
Chapter 7
Finally, connect light / heavy, PNA, pretreatment, and downstream route step by step. When stuck, work through the order: mixture → light / heavy → PNA → pretreatment → destination.
Entry point: high-school chemistry equations and mole ratios
An exercise where you reason about one set of conditions at a time.
A step that removes troublesome components before the main process.
The flow of where a feedstock is sent next — which unit, which use.
Choosing a light, paraffin-rich feedstock makes the steam-cracking storyline easy to read.
The flow becomes visible: hydrotreat heavy naphtha, then send it to reforming.
Even without changing the composition, nudging the cut toward the heavy side shifts the read.
| Lens | First question |
|---|---|
| Mixture or not | Can you write one molecular formula for it? |
| Light / heavy | Is the average carbon number on the up side or the down side? |
| PNA | Is paraffin, naphthene, or aromatic the thickest? |
| Pretreatment | Do you need to drop sulphur first to protect the catalyst? |
| Downstream route | Does it fit isomerization, reforming, or steam cracking best? |
Run through this order and even unfamiliar terms stop being intimidating.
What this course gives you is a sense of direction — "which way it moves." Whether a real lot is safe, or whether it meets a specification, is not decided by direction. Even the same name "naphtha" hides shifts in composition when crude, cut, or pretreatment changes. So in the field, treat the course's direction as the entry to a decision, and align the conclusion with three kinds of primary documents:
| Document | What you mainly read | Relation to course direction |
|---|---|---|
| SDS (Safety Data Sheet) | Flash point, vapour pressure, exposure limits, first aid, PPE | The course's claim that "the lighter side has stricter vapour / fire management" is grounded by checking SDS values. |
| Analytical data (COA, lot analysis) | Carbon-number distribution, PNA distribution, sulphur and aromatic content | Course phrases like "light paraffin-rich" or "heavy with thick naphthenes" are translated into the lot's actual numbers. |
| Specifications / in-house standards | Use-specific tolerances, intake conditions, banned substances | Whether a stream actually fits the downstream is finally decided OK / NG by the spec. |
Order of judgement: course direction → SDS and analytical data → specifications. Do not judge "this is safe because the course said so." The final step has to be confirmed against primary sources.
So that beginners can picture "what does an actual SDS or analysis look like?", here are made-up samples (dummy values). They are not real measurements — never use them as a basis for any decision.
| Item | Sample value (dummy) |
|---|---|
| Product name | Light naphtha (illustrative) |
| Flash point | Below −40 °C |
| Initial boiling point (IBP) | About 35 °C |
| Final boiling point (FBP) | About 95 °C |
| Vapour pressure | About 70 kPa (37.8 °C) |
| Main hazards | Flammable liquid (Category 1), skin irritation, respiratory effects from inhalation |
| First aid | If vapour is inhaled, move to fresh air. If skin contact occurs, wash with plenty of soap and water. |
| Analysis item | Sample value (dummy) |
|---|---|
| Density (15 °C) | 0.685 g/cm³ |
| Paraffins | 72 vol% |
| Naphthenes | 22 vol% |
| Aromatics | 6 vol% |
| Sulphur | Below 0.5 ppm |
| Carbon-number distribution | C5: 35%, C6: 45%, C7+: 20% |
| Item | Tolerance (dummy) |
|---|---|
| Sulphur | 1 ppm or less |
| Aromatics | 10 vol% or less |
| Initial boiling point | 30 °C or above |
| Final boiling point | 100 °C or below |
The directions the course taught you — "light paraffin-rich," "heavy with thick naphthenes" — only become meaningful when matched against numbers like these. Always read the actual sheet at the end.
Two questions on reading naphtha as a mixed fraction and matching light / heavy and PNA to the right downstream.
Conceptually, which feedstock is closest to one slanted toward ethylene?
Answer: A
For the "break into smaller pieces" storyline, a light, paraffin-rich feed is the clearest entry point.
Conceptually, which is closest to the feedstock you would feed to a reforming unit?
Answer: A
Reforming uses heavy naphtha, with sulphur removed in an upstream step as a default.
Two questions on choosing among the four verbs (protect / rearrange / push / break).
To improve the octane of the C5 / C6 front end without pushing up aromatics significantly, which operation is closest?
Answer: A
Isomerization is the typical route for raising the octane of light naphtha.
What is the main reason for placing sulphur removal in front of reforming?
Answer: A
Sulphur harms downstream catalysts, so it is removed first.
Three questions on light-side safety, the direction shifts when you move the cut, and the one-line summary of the whole course.
Which handling concern tends to rise most on the light cut?
Answer: A
The lighter the side, the higher the vapour pressure; fire and vapour management grow in importance.
Keeping the family ratios constant, which combination is most likely when you extend the final boiling point (FBP) toward the heavy side?
Answer: A
Pulling in more of the heavy side raises the average carbon number and lowers volatility.
Which statement is the most accurate overall summary of naphtha?
Answer: A
The starting point is to treat naphtha as "a mixed fraction that varies."